HOME RANGE AND MICROHABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF THE SOUTHERN RED-BACKED VOLE (MYODES GAPPERI) IN NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS

Resources, such as food and shelter, are unevenly distributed across the landscape at both macro and micro scales. Home range is one measure of space use that reflects an individual’s resource requirements (e.g., microhabitat characteristics) and competition for those resources (e.g., density dependence). This study focuses on the home range of the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi), comparing field methods for estimating home range and modeling the microhabitat characteristics that define the core area of the home range. Southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) are common to boreal forests, most often found in coniferous or mixed deciduous stands, and in the northeast, have an affinity for eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). With eastern hemlock populations in decline due to the invasive eastern hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae), it is unknown how M. gapperi space use will be affected. From 2014-2017, southern red-backed voles were censused across 12 (~1 ha) grids using mark-recapture methods and for a subset of individuals radiotelemetry. Individual home range size, core area size, and core area overlap were calculated for adults using kernel density estimators from both mark recapture live trapping and radiotelemetry data. At each capture point, forest structure, ground cover, and geographic features were measured to assess influence of microhabitat on home range and core area. Density was calculated on each grid for each year of the study using the POPAN parameterization of the Jolly-Seber model. In this thesis, Chapter One presents the effects of M. gapperi density on individual home range and core area. Differences in size and overlap are examined within and between sexes, and estimates compared between the two field techniques, mark-recapture and radiotelemetry, often used to delineate home range and core area. Density did not affect space use and female voles shared area more often with males than other females. The home range size of males was larger than that of females, however, core area was consistently about 30% of total home range. Area estimates generated under mark-recapture and radiotelemetry were similar for females, but differed for males with larger home ranges calculated using radiotelemetry. Mark-recapture methods may have underestimated male home range as a consequence of the trapping grid being smaller than male home range. Chapter Two identifies habitat characteristics at the macro and micro scale that influence M. gapperi space use. Macrohabitat differences were evaluated between trap stations that were visited and were not visited by M. gapperi and microhabitat characteristics were modeling within female M. gapperi core areas. Myodes gapperi are found in areas with higher eastern hemlock basal area and more coarse woody debris. Within these stands, female M. gapperi select for core areas closer to water, with greater red maple basal area, deeper leaf litter, and a greater density of hemlock stems

Influence of field technique, density, and sex on home range and overlap of the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi)

Home range is shaped by an individual’s interactions with the environment and conspecifics, and both size and placement may vary in response to population fluctuations. The method used to collect locational data may also affect home-range estimates. We examined the effect of density, sex, and field method on home range of southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi (Vigors, 1830)) inhabiting eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrière) forests. Twelve mark–recapture grids were used to census M. gapperi from 2014 to 2017. In 2017, individuals were radio-collared. Home-range size, core-area size, and shared space were calculated using kernel density estimators from both mark–recapture and radiotelemetry data. Density effects on home range and core area were analyzed and differences between sex and field method were compared. We found (i) density did not affect home-range size, (ii) male home range was larger than female home range, (iii) females shared space more frequently and to a greater extent with males than other females, and (iv) home-range estimates were not significantly different between mark–recapture and radiotelemetry. Male home range, however, was larger under radiotelemetry and may reflect a truncation effect when mark–recapture grid size is smaller than male home range.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author